Well that didn't work out
According to an Integrity Commissioner’s report, submitted on July 17, 2023, investigating multiple complaints regarding Chatham-Kent Councillor Rhonda Jubenville’s conduct, specifically her social media posts and public statements.
Key Findings and Complaints:
Numerous complaints were received between April and June 2023 regarding social media activity and public conduct by Councillor Jubenville.
The main controversy revolved around her opposition to raising non-government flags on municipal property, sparked by a denied request from an anti-abortion group to fly their flag.
Councillor Jubenville proposed a motion on April 24, 2023, to limit flag raisings to only the Canadian, Ontario, and Chatham-Kent municipal flags. The motion was defeated (5-12 vote), but a policy review on flag-raising was initiated.
She made multiple social media posts linking LGBTQ+ issues, drag events, and pedophilia, which drew public outrage.
Complaints also alleged that her comments and behavior encouraged hostility and intimidation, especially toward the LGBTQ+ community, council colleagues, and local school policies.
Investigation Process:
The Integrity Commissioner reviewed complaints, social media posts, and conducted interviews with complainants and Councillor Jubenville.
Some posts were deemed not in violation of the Council Code of Conduct, but others were found to be problematic.
The report highlights that her posts and conduct fueled division, misinformation, and intimidation within Chatham-Kent.
Findings and Violations:
Violation of Code of Conduct (Section 10 – Improper Use of Influence)
Councillor Jubenville used her position to push personal beliefs beyond her official duties.
She misrepresented municipal policies (e.g., federal flag rules) to encourage public backlash.
Violation of Code of Conduct (Section 15 – Discreditable Conduct)
Engaged in behavior considered abusive, bullying, and intimidating.
Made public attacks on other councillors and a private citizen.
Social media activity incited public hostility towards individuals and groups.
Response from Councillor Jubenville & Supporters:
Denied wrongdoing, claimed complaints were an attack on free speech.
Supporters argued she was being targeted for her conservative views.
Her lawyer argued that penalizing her would be a violation of Charter rights.
Recommendations & Consequences:
The Integrity Commissioner recommends suspending her pay for three months due to repeated violations.
She is not banned from social media but must adhere to ethical guidelines moving forward.
Conclusion:
The report found serious breaches in Councillor Jubenville’s conduct, particularly her use of social media to target groups and individuals, spread misinformation, and incite division. The case highlights broader tensions over freedom of speech vs. responsible governance in local politics.